Written:

Feb 2, 2026

Pendle Tokenomics: How vePENDLE Holders Earn 80% of Protocol Fees

Pendle Tokenomics: How vePENDLE Holders Earn 80% of Protocol Fees

Pendle Finance has carved out a unique niche in DeFi by enabling traders to speculate on future yield.

Pendle Finance has carved out a unique niche in DeFi by enabling traders to speculate on future yield. Unlike traditional lending protocols where yield is locked with your capital, Pendle splits yield-bearing assets into two tradeable components: Principal Tokens (PT) and Yield Tokens (YT). This innovation has generated over $50 million in revenue for token holders since launch, with vePENDLE stakers capturing 80% of all protocol fees.

Understanding Pendle's tokenomics reveals why sophisticated DeFi users lock their PENDLE tokens for up to two years. The protocol has processed $58 billion in fixed yield trading volume, establishing itself as the leading yield trading venue in crypto. This article explains how PENDLE token distribution works, how vePENDLE holders earn protocol revenue, and why Pendle's model differs from traditional DeFi protocols.

What is PENDLE Token?

PENDLE is the native governance and utility token of Pendle Finance, a yield trading protocol built on Ethereum and deployed across multiple chains including Arbitrum, BSC, and Optimism. The token serves three primary functions: governance participation through vePENDLE voting, liquidity incentives via gauge voting, and fee capture for long-term stakers.

The token has a maximum supply of 258.4 million PENDLE, with emissions following a decreasing schedule that reaches terminal inflation in 2026. Unlike many DeFi protocols where governance tokens provide limited tangible value, PENDLE directly captures protocol revenue through an 80/20 fee split favoring token holders.

Pendle's breakthrough innovation lies in yield tokenization. When you deposit yield-bearing assets like stETH or GLP into Pendle, the protocol separates the principal from the future yield. This creates two distinct tradeable assets: PT (representing locked principal that trades at a discount) and YT (representing rights to future yield that can be speculated on). This separation enables fixed-rate lending, yield speculation, and sophisticated hedging strategies previously impossible in DeFi.

How Pendle Yield Trading Works

Yield tokenization transforms how DeFi users interact with yield-bearing positions. Traditional yield farming locks your capital and yield together—if you want to exit, you forfeit future earnings. Pendle decouples these components, creating new trading opportunities and risk management strategies.

Principal Tokens (PT): Fixed-Rate DeFi

Principal Tokens represent the underlying asset stripped of its yield component. When you mint 1 PT, you simultaneously create 1 YT. PT trades at a discount to its underlying asset because the yield has been separated. At maturity, PT holders can redeem their tokens 1:1 for the base asset.

This discount creates an implicit fixed yield. If PT-stETH trades at 0.95 ETH with 6 months until maturity, buyers lock in approximately 10% annualized fixed yield. This mechanism functions similarly to zero-coupon bonds in traditional finance, where the difference between purchase price and face value represents your guaranteed return.

For risk-averse DeFi users, PT offers predictable returns without exposure to yield volatility. During periods of declining yields across DeFi, PT holders remain unaffected because their return was fixed at purchase. This makes PT particularly attractive when base layer yields are elevated but expected to compress.

Yield Tokens (YT): Leveraged Yield Exposure

Yield Tokens represent entitlement to all yield, rewards, and points generated by the underlying asset until expiry. Holding YT provides leveraged exposure to yield because you only pay for the yield component rather than the full asset price.

If stETH generates 4% APY and YT-stETH costs 0.04 ETH while stETH trades at 1 ETH, you've achieved 25x leverage on the yield. If staking yields double to 8%, YT holders capture the full increase despite paying only 4% of the principal cost. This capital efficiency makes YT attractive for yield bulls who believe rates will rise.

YT also captures protocol points and airdrops. During 2024's points farming meta, YT for assets like EigenLayer's restaked ETH became highly sought after. Buyers could speculate on airdrop value without locking up the full principal, creating a liquid market for future incentive distributions.

AMM Design for Time-Decay Assets

Pendle's automated market maker accounts for time decay inherent in expiring assets. Traditional constant-product AMMs struggle with assets that lose value over time, but Pendle's custom AMM maintains efficient pricing as YT approaches worthlessness at maturity.

The protocol uses a specialized curve that adjusts based on time to maturity and implied yield. This ensures liquidity providers earn fees without suffering excessive impermanent loss from YT's declining time value. The AMM design represents one of Pendle's key technical innovations, enabling liquid markets for time-sensitive yield positions.

PENDLE Token Distribution and Supply

PENDLE has a capped maximum supply of 258.4 million tokens, with emissions following a predictable decay schedule. Weekly emissions decrease by approximately 1.1% each week, gradually reducing inflation until reaching terminal emissions in 2026. After reaching the supply cap, the protocol implements a 2% annual inflation rate to maintain liquidity incentives.

The initial distribution allocated tokens across multiple stakeholder groups. The team and investors received locked allocations with multi-year vesting schedules, ensuring long-term alignment with protocol success. The ecosystem fund received a significant allocation to bootstrap liquidity and incentivize early users during Pendle's launch phase.

Liquidity mining drives the majority of token emissions. PENDLE rewards are distributed to liquidity providers in PT and YT pools based on gauge voting results. This creates a flywheel where vePENDLE holders direct emissions toward pools they provide liquidity for, maximizing their own returns while deepening market liquidity.

Unlike protocols with perpetual high inflation, Pendle's decreasing emission schedule creates progressive scarcity. As weekly emissions decline, the protocol must generate sufficient fee revenue to attract liquidity through revenue sharing rather than token incentives. This transition from incentive-driven to fee-driven growth tests the protocol's long-term sustainability.

vePENDLE: Voting Escrow Mechanics

The vePENDLE system follows the vote-escrow model pioneered by Curve Finance, adapted for Pendle's yield trading use case. By locking PENDLE tokens for extended periods, holders gain governance power, revenue sharing, and yield boosts that exceed what unlocked token holders receive.

Locking Mechanics and Voting Power

Users lock PENDLE tokens for durations ranging from one week to two years (104 weeks maximum). Voting power scales linearly with lock duration: locking for maximum duration grants 1 vePENDLE per 1 PENDLE locked, while shorter locks receive proportionally less voting power.

vePENDLE is non-transferable and decays linearly over time. A two-year lock that generated 1,000 vePENDLE will decay to zero over the lock period. This ensures voting power remains with committed long-term holders rather than mercenary capital that might exit after governance decisions.

Users can extend lock duration or add tokens to existing positions, but cannot reduce lock time or withdraw early without penalty. This design prevents manipulation where users could lock only for important votes then immediately unlock.

80% Fee Distribution to vePENDLE Holders

Pendle's revenue model generates fees from two primary sources: a 3% fee on YT yield (previously 5%) and swap fees from the AMM pools. In recent months, the protocol has generated $1.1 million in monthly fees, with $884,000 (80%) distributed to vePENDLE holders and $221,000 (20%) flowing to the protocol treasury.

This revenue split heavily favors token holders compared to most DeFi protocols. While projects like Uniswap accumulate protocol-owned fees without distributing to token holders, Pendle returns the majority of revenue directly to stakers. This creates tangible value accrual beyond speculative governance rights.

Fee distributions occur automatically through the protocol's smart contracts. vePENDLE holders claim accumulated fees at their convenience, receiving a mix of assets based on the underlying pools generating fees. During periods of high Ethereum staking yields or points farming activity, fee distributions increase proportionally with protocol volume.

Over the protocol's lifetime, vePENDLE holders have collectively earned over $50 million in fees. This represents significant real yield distributed to token holders, validating the economic model and incentivizing long-term participation. During peak activity periods in 2024, annualized protocol revenue approached $40 million.

Gauge Voting and Liquidity Incentives

vePENDLE holders vote weekly on gauge weights, determining which PT/YT pools receive PENDLE emissions. This governance mechanism allows token holders to direct incentives toward pools they find strategically important or where they provide liquidity themselves.

Gauge voting creates interesting dynamics. Large vePENDLE holders can effectively incentivize their own pools, paying themselves to provide liquidity. Protocols seeking deep liquidity for their yield tokens often accumulate vePENDLE to direct emissions, similar to "bribes" in the Curve ecosystem.

Pools receiving higher gauge weights attract more liquidity providers seeking PENDLE rewards. This deepens liquidity, tightens spreads, and improves execution for traders. The voting system creates a marketplace where different stakeholders compete for protocol incentives while ultimately improving the user experience.

LP Yield Boosts

Beyond fee sharing and governance, vePENDLE provides yield boosts on liquidity providing positions. LP providers with vePENDLE receive up to 250% multiplier on their PENDLE rewards compared to non-stakers. This boost incentivizes lockup of earned PENDLE rather than immediate selling.

The boost formula considers both your vePENDLE balance and your LP position size. Smaller LPs need less vePENDLE to achieve maximum boost, while large liquidity providers must accumulate significant vePENDLE stakes. This creates natural demand for token lockup as successful LPs seek to maximize returns.

Pendle Protocol Performance and Metrics

Pendle's growth trajectory illustrates strong product-market fit in the yield trading category. The protocol has facilitated $58 billion in cumulative fixed yield trading volume since launch, with particular acceleration during 2024's points farming meta.

Total value locked (TVL) peaked above $6 billion during height of EigenLayer and ether.fi points campaigns. While TVL has declined from peak levels as some farming opportunities concluded, the protocol maintains substantial liquidity across its primary markets. Ethereum mainnet and Arbitrum represent the largest deployments by TVL and trading volume.

Monthly active users demonstrate consistent engagement with the protocol. During peak periods, Pendle served over 100,000 unique addresses monthly, with many users returning regularly to roll positions as PT/YT markets expire and new maturities launch.

Revenue generation has grown substantially year-over-year. The protocol's 30-day fees of $1.1 million represent significant value capture, with the 80% holder allocation creating one of the highest real yield opportunities in DeFi. Protocols generating similar revenue often distribute far less to token holders, instead accumulating treasury assets or directing funds to development.

The diversity of assets supported by Pendle continues expanding. Beyond Ethereum staking derivatives, the protocol supports wrapped BTC yields, stablecoin yields, Pendle-wrapped tokens from protocols like GMX, and various liquid staking tokens across multiple chains. This diversification reduces dependency on any single yield source.

Comparing Pendle to Other Yield Protocols

Pendle occupies a unique position in the DeFi yield landscape. While protocols like Aave and Compound offer variable rate lending and Notional Finance provides fixed rates, Pendle remains the only major protocol enabling direct speculation on yield direction through liquid markets.

Fixed Rate Protocols

Notional Finance offers fixed-rate lending through a different mechanism: maturity-matched liquidity pools where lenders and borrowers lock rates for specific durations. While this achieves fixed rates, it lacks Pendle's separation of principal and yield. You cannot speculate on yield direction without taking a lending or borrowing position.

Element Finance attempted yield tokenization similarly to Pendle but struggled to achieve sufficient liquidity. The protocol ultimately sunset its yield trading features, highlighting the execution challenges in this category. Pendle's success where others failed stems from superior AMM design, aggressive liquidity incentives, and timing with the points farming trend.

Vote-Escrow Protocols

Curve Finance pioneered the vote-escrow model that Pendle adapted. Both protocols lock governance tokens for extended periods in exchange for voting power and revenue sharing. However, Curve's fee distribution percentage has historically been lower, with more revenue accumulating to the protocol rather than token holders.

Balancer, Frax, and numerous other protocols have adopted variations of the vote-escrow model. Pendle's 80% fee share stands out as among the most holder-friendly distributions in DeFi. This generosity reflects the protocol's strategy to maximize staking participation and voting power concentration.

Yield Aggregators

Yearn Finance and similar yield aggregators optimize returns across lending protocols but don't enable yield trading. These protocols serve complementary rather than competitive functions. A Yearn strategy could theoretically deploy into Pendle pools, and some PT positions offer attractive risk-adjusted returns for conservative strategies.

Risks and Considerations

Pendle's tokenomics model carries specific risks that potential participants should understand. Smart contract risk exists across all positions—the protocol's complexity from custom AMM logic and yield tokenization creates attack surface. Multiple audits have been conducted, but no system is completely risk-free.

vePENDLE lock duration represents an illiquidity risk. Unlike liquid staking where you can exit positions relatively quickly, vePENDLE requires waiting until lock expiry. If token price declines significantly during your lock period, you cannot exit to limit losses. This makes lock duration a critical decision based on your conviction and risk tolerance.

Yield Token positions carry complete loss risk at maturity. If you purchase YT expecting yields to remain elevated but they decline instead, your position loses value rapidly as maturity approaches. YT reaching zero value at expiry is expected behavior when yield drops below your entry price. This makes YT suitable only for informed users with strong yield market opinions.

Protocol revenue depends on trading volume and yield market volatility. During stable yield environments with little rate movement, traders have less incentive to enter positions. Extended periods of low volatility could reduce fee generation, impacting vePENDLE holder returns. The protocol's growth requires sustained interest in yield trading strategies.

Competition in the yield trading category could intensify. While Pendle currently dominates this niche, successful protocols often attract well-funded competitors. New entrants with improved mechanics or better token incentives could challenge Pendle's market position. The protocol must continue innovating to maintain leadership.

FAQ

How much can you earn staking PENDLE?

vePENDLE holders earn approximately 80% of protocol fees, which recently totaled $884,000 monthly from $1.1 million in total fees. Returns vary based on protocol volume, your lock duration, and the total amount of PENDLE locked. Historical returns have ranged from single-digit APYs during quiet periods to double-digit yields during high activity. The $50 million in all-time holder revenue demonstrates substantial value accrual over the protocol's lifetime.

What is the difference between PT and YT tokens?

PT (Principal Token) represents the underlying asset without yield, trading at a discount and offering fixed returns until maturity. YT (Yield Token) represents rights to all future yield until expiry, providing leveraged exposure to rate changes. When you deposit 1 unit of a yield-bearing asset, Pendle creates 1 PT + 1 YT. At maturity, 1 PT + 1 YT can redeem for 1 unit of the base asset.

Is Pendle better than Curve for governance tokens?

Pendle and Curve serve different purposes—Curve focuses on stablecoin swaps and liquidity for correlated assets, while Pendle specializes in yield trading. Both use vote-escrow models, but Pendle distributes 80% of fees to stakers versus Curve's historically lower percentage. For investors prioritizing fee revenue, Pendle's distribution is more generous. However, Curve's larger TVL and established ecosystem create different value propositions. Neither is objectively "better"—they suit different strategies.

How long should you lock PENDLE for vePENDLE?

Lock duration depends on your conviction in Pendle's long-term growth and your liquidity needs. Maximum two-year locks grant full voting power and highest fee share percentages, but expose you to extended illiquidity. Many users start with shorter 3-6 month locks to test the system before committing to longer durations. Consider that vePENDLE decays linearly—a two-year lock loses voting power steadily over time unless you extend the lock or add more PENDLE.

Does Pendle work on multiple blockchains?

Yes, Pendle operates on Ethereum mainnet, Arbitrum, Binance Smart Chain, and Optimism. Ethereum mainnet hosts the largest TVL and most diverse asset selection, while Arbitrum offers lower transaction costs for smaller positions. Each deployment operates independently with its own liquidity pools and PT/YT markets. Users must bridge assets between chains to access different deployments—vePENDLE voting power does not automatically transfer across chains.

Key Takeaways

  • Pendle enables yield trading by splitting assets into PT (principal) and YT (yield) tokens, creating markets for fixed rates and yield speculation

  • vePENDLE holders receive 80% of protocol fees, generating $884,000 monthly from recent $1.1 million in total fees and $50 million+ lifetime

  • Locking PENDLE for up to two years grants voting power to direct liquidity incentives, LP yield boosts up to 250%, and proportional fee distributions

  • The protocol has facilitated $58 billion in yield trading volume with peak TVL exceeding $6 billion during major points farming campaigns

  • PT offers fixed-rate exposure similar to bonds while YT provides leveraged yield speculation, serving different risk/return profiles

  • Pendle's 258.4 million token cap with decreasing emissions creates progressive scarcity as the protocol transitions from incentive to fee-driven growth

  • Risks include smart contract complexity, vePENDLE illiquidity during lock periods, and YT positions potentially expiring worthless if yields decline

Conclusion

Pendle's tokenomics create a compelling value proposition for DeFi users seeking exposure to yield markets. The 80% fee distribution to vePENDLE holders sets a high standard for token holder alignment, while the PT/YT innovation enables previously impossible trading strategies. With over $50 million distributed to holders and $58 billion in trading volume, the protocol has demonstrated substantial product-market fit.

The vote-escrow model incentivizes long-term holding through governance rights, fee sharing, and LP boosts. This creates natural buy pressure as successful users lock tokens to maximize returns on their liquidity providing positions. As emissions decrease toward terminal inflation, fee revenue becomes increasingly important for sustaining protocol growth.

For DeFi participants interested in fixed rates, yield speculation, or real yield generation, understanding Pendle's mechanics and tokenomics provides insight into one of DeFi's most innovative protocols. Whether you're seeking predictable returns through PT positions or leveraged yield exposure via YT, Pendle's infrastructure enables sophisticated strategies with liquid markets and transparent pricing.

FAQs
FAQs
FAQs

PENDLE Tokenomics FAQ

Discover PENDLE tokenomics frequent asked questions

Discover PENDLE tokenomics frequent asked questions

Discover PENDLE tokenomics frequent asked questions

How much can you earn staking PENDLE?

vePENDLE holders earn approximately 80% of protocol fees, which recently totaled $884,000 monthly from $1.1 million in total fees. Returns vary based on protocol volume, your lock duration, and the total amount of PENDLE locked. Historical returns have ranged from single-digit APYs during quiet periods to double-digit yields during high activity. The $50 million in all-time holder revenue demonstrates substantial value accrual over the protocol's lifetime.

How much can you earn staking PENDLE?

vePENDLE holders earn approximately 80% of protocol fees, which recently totaled $884,000 monthly from $1.1 million in total fees. Returns vary based on protocol volume, your lock duration, and the total amount of PENDLE locked. Historical returns have ranged from single-digit APYs during quiet periods to double-digit yields during high activity. The $50 million in all-time holder revenue demonstrates substantial value accrual over the protocol's lifetime.

How much can you earn staking PENDLE?

vePENDLE holders earn approximately 80% of protocol fees, which recently totaled $884,000 monthly from $1.1 million in total fees. Returns vary based on protocol volume, your lock duration, and the total amount of PENDLE locked. Historical returns have ranged from single-digit APYs during quiet periods to double-digit yields during high activity. The $50 million in all-time holder revenue demonstrates substantial value accrual over the protocol's lifetime.

What is the difference between PT and YT tokens?

PT (Principal Token) represents the underlying asset without yield, trading at a discount and offering fixed returns until maturity. YT (Yield Token) represents rights to all future yield until expiry, providing leveraged exposure to rate changes. When you deposit 1 unit of a yield-bearing asset, Pendle creates 1 PT + 1 YT. At maturity, 1 PT + 1 YT can redeem for 1 unit of the base asset.

What is the difference between PT and YT tokens?

PT (Principal Token) represents the underlying asset without yield, trading at a discount and offering fixed returns until maturity. YT (Yield Token) represents rights to all future yield until expiry, providing leveraged exposure to rate changes. When you deposit 1 unit of a yield-bearing asset, Pendle creates 1 PT + 1 YT. At maturity, 1 PT + 1 YT can redeem for 1 unit of the base asset.

What is the difference between PT and YT tokens?

PT (Principal Token) represents the underlying asset without yield, trading at a discount and offering fixed returns until maturity. YT (Yield Token) represents rights to all future yield until expiry, providing leveraged exposure to rate changes. When you deposit 1 unit of a yield-bearing asset, Pendle creates 1 PT + 1 YT. At maturity, 1 PT + 1 YT can redeem for 1 unit of the base asset.

Is Pendle better than Curve for governance tokens?

Pendle and Curve serve different purposes—Curve focuses on stablecoin swaps and liquidity for correlated assets, while Pendle specializes in yield trading. Both use vote-escrow models, but Pendle distributes 80% of fees to stakers versus Curve's historically lower percentage. For investors prioritizing fee revenue, Pendle's distribution is more generous. However, Curve's larger TVL and established ecosystem create different value propositions. Neither is objectively "better"—they suit different strategies.

Is Pendle better than Curve for governance tokens?

Pendle and Curve serve different purposes—Curve focuses on stablecoin swaps and liquidity for correlated assets, while Pendle specializes in yield trading. Both use vote-escrow models, but Pendle distributes 80% of fees to stakers versus Curve's historically lower percentage. For investors prioritizing fee revenue, Pendle's distribution is more generous. However, Curve's larger TVL and established ecosystem create different value propositions. Neither is objectively "better"—they suit different strategies.

Is Pendle better than Curve for governance tokens?

Pendle and Curve serve different purposes—Curve focuses on stablecoin swaps and liquidity for correlated assets, while Pendle specializes in yield trading. Both use vote-escrow models, but Pendle distributes 80% of fees to stakers versus Curve's historically lower percentage. For investors prioritizing fee revenue, Pendle's distribution is more generous. However, Curve's larger TVL and established ecosystem create different value propositions. Neither is objectively "better"—they suit different strategies.

How long should you lock PENDLE for vePENDLE?

Lock duration depends on your conviction in Pendle's long-term growth and your liquidity needs. Maximum two-year locks grant full voting power and highest fee share percentages, but expose you to extended illiquidity. Many users start with shorter 3-6 month locks to test the system before committing to longer durations. Consider that vePENDLE decays linearly—a two-year lock loses voting power steadily over time unless you extend the lock or add more PENDLE.

How long should you lock PENDLE for vePENDLE?

Lock duration depends on your conviction in Pendle's long-term growth and your liquidity needs. Maximum two-year locks grant full voting power and highest fee share percentages, but expose you to extended illiquidity. Many users start with shorter 3-6 month locks to test the system before committing to longer durations. Consider that vePENDLE decays linearly—a two-year lock loses voting power steadily over time unless you extend the lock or add more PENDLE.

How long should you lock PENDLE for vePENDLE?

Lock duration depends on your conviction in Pendle's long-term growth and your liquidity needs. Maximum two-year locks grant full voting power and highest fee share percentages, but expose you to extended illiquidity. Many users start with shorter 3-6 month locks to test the system before committing to longer durations. Consider that vePENDLE decays linearly—a two-year lock loses voting power steadily over time unless you extend the lock or add more PENDLE.

Does Pendle work on multiple blockchains?

Yes, Pendle operates on Ethereum mainnet, Arbitrum, Binance Smart Chain, and Optimism. Ethereum mainnet hosts the largest TVL and most diverse asset selection, while Arbitrum offers lower transaction costs for smaller positions. Each deployment operates independently with its own liquidity pools and PT/YT markets. Users must bridge assets between chains to access different deployments—vePENDLE voting power does not automatically transfer across chains.

Does Pendle work on multiple blockchains?

Yes, Pendle operates on Ethereum mainnet, Arbitrum, Binance Smart Chain, and Optimism. Ethereum mainnet hosts the largest TVL and most diverse asset selection, while Arbitrum offers lower transaction costs for smaller positions. Each deployment operates independently with its own liquidity pools and PT/YT markets. Users must bridge assets between chains to access different deployments—vePENDLE voting power does not automatically transfer across chains.

Does Pendle work on multiple blockchains?

Yes, Pendle operates on Ethereum mainnet, Arbitrum, Binance Smart Chain, and Optimism. Ethereum mainnet hosts the largest TVL and most diverse asset selection, while Arbitrum offers lower transaction costs for smaller positions. Each deployment operates independently with its own liquidity pools and PT/YT markets. Users must bridge assets between chains to access different deployments—vePENDLE voting power does not automatically transfer across chains.

About the Author

Founder of Tokenomics.com

With over 750 tokenomics models audited and a dataset of 2,500+ projects, we’ve developed the most structured and data-backed framework for tokenomics analysis in the industry.

Previously managing partner at a web3 venture fund (exit in 2021).

Since then, Andres has personally advised 80+ projects across DeFi, DePIN, RWA, and infrastructure.

Previous

Next